Whether they were ministerial orders, decrees or sentences, have amended the plan of this issue. For example, a few days after the decree, on June 30, 1938, a ministerial order supplemented the provisions, expanding the assumptions and establishing a penalty system in case of non-compliance. In 1984, already in democracy, the obligation to establish school canteens was limited , according to the provisions of the Central Labor Court.
It was said that it was only mandatory to have these facilities when they were going to be used in practice, which excluded many offices because they finished their work shift just at lunchtime. To date, this precept continues to be used. As for the buy email database penalty system, it has had to be updated, and the current reference is Royal Decree 5/2000 , which establishes fines of between 300 and 3,000 euros for companies that do not have these facilities.
In any case, this decree did not alter the fundamentals of the matter. On the other hand, the Supreme Court definitively settled the matter, for now, in the sentence of December 26, 2011 of the Social Chamber. Although it dismisses some of the principles on which the decree was based, it ends by saying that it does not violate constitutional principles of dignity of work, that it has not been repealed and that there is no legislation to replace it. In short.